No place for a gallery on the Holocaust in the new Canadian Museum of Human Rights?

Those who want a permanent gallery on the Holocaust at the museum are portrayed as Stalinist Pigs

In the Baltic States and in Eastern Europe, where post Soviet narratives of nationhood are being written, there is a temptation to emphasize the crimes of the Stalinists and to de-emphasize the crimes of the nationalists.  The crimes of the Stalinists against the nations of Eastern Europe are of course real and terrible – and also largely forgotten, particularly during Soviet rule.  Not least amongst the historical crimes of the nationalists, however, was help given to the Nazi movement in perpetrating the Holocaust.

Buried within rhetoric about remembering all these historical atrocities equally is a temptation to rehabilitate perpetrators of the Holocaust as partisan heroes against the Stalinists, and to criminzlise Jews as supporters of Communism.  Buried within the rhetoric about remembering “equal genocides” is sometimes a wish to portray Stalin as being worse than Hitler.

The Canadian government is building a Museum of Human Rights in Winnipeg.  In this museum it is proposed to found a gallery on the Holocaust, and on the effect that the post Holocaust settlement had on the international idea nd practice of Human Rights.

There is a large Ukranian community in Canada, and among that community is a nationalist campaign against this “centering” of the Holocaust in the story of the development of human rights.

Per Anders Rudling, a scholar who has taught in Canada and is a specialist in Ukranian nationalism, has, with colleagues, written the following open letter, which he is asking scholars and academics to sign.  Please use your academic email address and send details of your name, position and institution to him.  rudlingp@uni-greifswald.de

Catherine Chatterley, the director of the Canadian Institute for the Study of Antisemitism has written this op-ed explaining the issues.

This is the proposed text of the open letter:

The Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the Ukrainian Canadian Congress, and the Canadian Museum of Human Rights

The Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the Ukrainian Canadian Congress have been campaigning against the plans of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights in Winnipeg to mount a permanent Holocaust gallery. The UCCLA has mailed out a postcard across Canada that reproduces the cover of an edition of George Orwell’s Animal Farm and implies that supporters of a Holocaust gallery are pigs. For its part, the UCC, which, in contrast to the UCCLA, is an elected body that represents major Ukrainian Canadian organizations, has complained that the planned Holocaust exhibit is “unacceptable” and has asked the Museum to provide the Holodomor, or Ukrainian famine of 1932-33, “no less coverage… than the Holocaust.”

We, the signatories to this letter, have all studied various aspects of genocide, fascism, anti-Semitism, Stalinism, war criminality, the Holodomor, and the Holocaust. We unequivocally recognize that the violence and oppression that Ukraine has experienced during its multi-totalitarian past ought to be remembered and commemorated in a Canadian museum devoted to the history and abuse of human rights. What we object to is the dishonest manner in which the UCCLA and UCC have distorted historical accounts of the Holodomor while at the same time refusing to acknowledge the Ukrainian nationalist movement’s role in the Holocaust.

The Ukrainian famine, which constitutes one of Stalin’s great crimes and one of Europe’s most devastating tragedies, deserves a place in any venue dedicated to commemorating and understanding the violation of human rights. Yet the way the UCC treats the Holodomor is problematic. All demographic studies place the number of famine deaths in Soviet Ukraine in the range of 2.6 to 3.9 million. This is, in itself, a grievous toll. Nonetheless, the UCC has, at times, inflated the number of victims to seven or even ten million. The implication is obvious: seven or ten million is more than six million; the Holodomor deserves more attention than the Holocaust. Such a manipulative attempt to exploit human suffering is reprehensible and should not be acceptable to the Canadian public.

We are also troubled by the UCCLA and UCC’s attitude toward the OUN, the UPA, and the 14th Grenadier Division of the Waffen SS ‘Galicia’ (1st Ukrainian). OUN stands for the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists. UPA is the Ukrainian abbreviation for the Ukrainian Insurgent Army, the armed branch of the OUN. The Galicia Division, a military unit that was primarily involved in counterinsurgency activities, was established by the Germans in 1943. Tens of thousands of Ukrainians who belonged to these formations perished while resisting the ruthless imposition of Soviet power at the end of the war. Today many Ukrainians revere the members of these organizations as the champions of an oppressed people. In February 2010, the UCC called on the Canadian government “to make changes to Canada’s War Veterans Allowance Act by expanding eligibility to include designated resistance groups such as OUN-UPA.” Last Remembrance Day, the UCC asked Ukrainian Canadians to honour veterans who belonged to OUN, UPA, and the Galicia Division.

In their calls to honour the members of these organizations as veterans, what the UCCLA and the UCC do not fully acknowledge is that all three groups have been implicated in violence against civilians on a massive scale. Significant historical research indicates the political responsibility of the OUN in anti-Jewish violence in the summer of 1941. Emerging research also demonstrates that many former policemen who aided the Nazis in genocidal operations subsequently joined the UPA, created in early 1943. Moreover, it is incontrovertible that the UPA murdered tens of thousands of civilian Poles in the western province of Volhynia to undercut the ability of postwar Poland to make claims on the area. The Galicia Division was also involved in anti-civilian military actions, although mainly outside of Ukraine.

By pointing out the historical record of the OUN, UPA, and the Galicia Division, we do not mean to suggest some sort of collective responsibility for genocide on the part of all the men and women who served in them, and certainly not on the part of all Ukrainians. Nevertheless, in an age when the mass murder of civilians is regarded as a crime against humanity, the mixed record of these organizations has to be openly debated, particularly when the significance of the Holocaust is being questioned in a public campaign pertaining to a fair representation of the history of human rights.

We therefore assert that since the UCCLA and UCC have not understood that confronting the historical record openly and honestly is preferable to manipulative falsehood, have engaged in a competition of suffering, and have failed to acknowledge both the vices and the virtues of the nationalist movement, they ought to stay out of a debate about the Canadian Museum of Human Rights.

Per Anders Rudling, a scholar who has taught in Canada and is a specialist in Ukranian nationalism, has, with colleagues, written the following open letter, which he is asking scholars and academics to sign.  Please use your academic email address and send details of your name, position and institution to him.  rudlingp@uni-greifswald.de

Catherine Chatterley, the director of the Canadian Institute for the Study of Antisemitism has written this op-ed explaining the issues.

For more background information on the campaign in Eastern Europe to normalize the memory of the Holocaust, see the excellent www.HolocaustInTheBaltics.com

2 Responses to “No place for a gallery on the Holocaust in the new Canadian Museum of Human Rights?”

  1. Oksana Ensslen Says:

    I find it very unsettling that your group feels that two events, seperated by a decade, and also seperated by geography, are being grouped together. It is in my opinion, an attempt to smear all Ukrainians, and in perticular, the victims of the famine”Holodomor”, with the label of anti-semeticism. Your inference is intellectually dishonest. The communist government settled large numbers of russians in the lands cleared of Ukrainian peasants, and still needed to redo its census,apparently with more acceptable data, before realeasing it. Why? It seems obvious because even the transfer of population was inadequate to cover the huge death toll.

    The issue of alleged crimes of the Ukrainian Division agaainst has been the subject of at least one Royal Commision in Canada. It was not supported, but the issue is often reserected as if it is proven. I do not accept this. However, even if this were true, it is dishonest to link these events to the Holodomor.Your creadibility, and the credibility of all your undersigned, has fallen in my estimation.

  2. Commenter Says:

    As far as I understand the letter, the allegation that those murdered in the famiine are being “smeared” as antisemitic is not correct. Rather, what is being argued is that the same organisations that are currently arguing their own case for memorialisation through challenging a (permanent) remembrance of the Holocaust and its relationship to the emergence of global Human Rights (as expressed in the UNHR charter) as well as using antisemitic imagery to do so are precisely the same groups that try to portray those Ukranians that were involved in the genocide of Jews as some sort of “national liberators” or “national heroes”. Hence, the connections made in the letter.

    In the hope that I will not be misunderstood, of course the Holodomor must be remembered. I do not see, however, why such a call for remembrance of the Ukranian tragedy should be pursued through the attempt to denigrate the memorialisation of another tragedy; nor, why such a campaign should feature antisemitic imagery and sentiment (as evident in the postcard).

    In many ways the arguments made by these particular Canadian associations in arguing for a Holodomor exhibition, not in its own terms, but against the existence of a Holocaust exhibition (as if somehow the existence of the latter is relevant to the existence of the former) replicates the old antisemitic myth (prevalent, of course, not only in Ukraine) that somehow Jews are more “privileged” than other peoples; only this time it is the idea that even in death, the Jews have it better than anyone else – a rather unpleasant (to say the least) way of expressing things one would think.

    That is the point I think the letter is raising.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 121 other followers

%d bloggers like this: