Eric Lee’s response to Jonathan Freedland

This response by Eric Lee is to this piece by Jonathan Freedland.

The worst thing about Jonathan Freedland’s article is not the lyrics but the melody.

The article is song-like in its constant repetition of a refrain of “Palestinians say this” followed by “Israelis says that”, paragraph after paragraph, an unending rhythm, beautiful in its simplicity.

But Freedland describes symmetry where there is no symmetry. He equates that which cannot be equated.

Writing from the safety of chilly England, Freedland looks down upon the hot-tempered fools in the Middle East who can’t see things as clearly as he does. He can’t understand why the residents of Ashkelon, Beersheba and Sderot – and today, all Israelis – are cheering on the IDF. They must all be mad.

It’s perfectly obvious to Freedland that both sides are responsible for this mess, that neither side is right, and neither side is wrong.

Despite the attempt at an oh-so-English even-handedness, the article bristles with contempt for Israel – and not for this or that Israeli politician, but for the whole country. Israel, he writes, is “dazzled by its own military might” and believes “that force is almost always the answer”.

Freedland believes that in this case, force is not the answer. The answer to the incessant Hamas rocket barrage – which consisted of some 6,000 attacks on Israel – should have been … opening Gaza’s borders. Hug your enemies and turn the other cheek. That obviously would have worked. I wonder why Israel didn’t try that.

Freedland’s carefully-chosen language betrays his own bias. He speaks of “supporters of the Palestinians” — but Israel’s “cheerleaders”. He asks if what Israel is doing makes any sense – but he doesn’t ask the question of Hamas. He is neutral on the issue of who broke the cease-fire, but ignores the broader issue of what Hamas is (a fascist movement with genocidal intentions) and what it has done to Gaza since Israel unilaterally withdrew its settlements and troops.

Freedland is convinced that if Israel does anything at all to defend itself it will only make things worse. He says that when Israel acts in self-defence, “Gazans blame Israel – and close ranks with Hamas”. He quotes approvingly a Palestinian who says “anything which doesn’t kill Hamas makes them stronger.”

What utter nonsense. Wars end when the losing side becomes convinced that the enemy cannot be beaten, and that the use of force is counter-productive. That lesson was clearly learned by the Germans and Japanese in 1945. Killing lots of Germans may well have enraged them and caused them to “close ranks” and so on. But in the end, that’s how wars are won.

Jonathan Freedland is no enemy of Israel and certainly no fool. Yet he buys into the idiotic argument that Israel dare not defend itself for fear of angering its enemies. He’s equating the fire-fighters with the arsonists and is doing precisely what he accuses Israel of doing: avoiding the tough questions.

Eric Lee

7 Responses to “Eric Lee’s response to Jonathan Freedland”

  1. Karl Pfeifer Says:

    An excellent commentary.
    Of course Freedland is no fool, but he knows what is expected from “good Jews”. At least this is the impression, when I am reading what he wrote.

  2. fred Says:

    “Wars end when the losing side becomes convinced that the enemy cannot be beaten, and that the use of force is counter-productive. ”

    counterproductive to jihad?

  3. Karl Pfeifer Says:

    Fred yes of course to Jihad.

    Hamas advocated out of ideology suicide bombing in Israel.
    When Israel started to give signs, that it will not tolerate that by targeting some leaders of Hamas they stopped suicide bombings. For the bosses of Hamas do’nt care, if some poor guy or woman is committing suicide bombing, but when it comes to their own person, they care very much.

  4. PetraMB Says:

    Oh, thank you, that was MUCH needed!!! And nice point about the “supporters” of the Palestinians and Israel’s “cheerleaders” — I also noticed this when I read Freedland’s piece: this is how language is used oh so subtly to create bias.

  5. Brian Goldfarb Says:

    fred, I know these will sound like “weasel words” (i.e., avoiding plain speaking), but when an army, regime or whole nation finds its weaponry (including people) degraded – that is, it’s running out of them and the space to use them in – it tends to stop fighting, unless it _really_ does wish to fight to the last person. While that might be an appealing prospect for the leaders of Hamas, it’s more likely that the pbi (poor bloody infantry – see “Lucky Jim”, by Kingsley Amis) and, especially, the civilain population will want a cessation of hostilities long before _that_ happens.

    Once Hitler was dead, it was essentially what the German armed forces did – stopped fighting. Jihadists might want to fight to the last person, but they’re likely to find they’re running out of warm, willing bodies long before “the end” comes: desertions, failing to turn up to fight, rising rates of surrender to the “enemy”, who comes to seem a better friend than your erstwhile leaders, especially if they warmly welcome prisoners of war.

    Jihadists need volunteers to fight their battles for them: they’re often as bad as the “chateau generals” of the First World War at getting close enough to the action to really risk getting killed (there are, of course, exceptions, given the sophistication of modern weaponry).

  6. Bialik Says:

    There is one area where equivalence is not suggested. It is again noticeable that action by Israel is supposed to radicalise the Arab world but action by Hamas is not supposed to have any effect on Israelis. I wish someone from the commentariat would explain this.

  7. Brian Goldfarb Says:

    Bialik, if they could explain that, they wouldn’t be members of the “commentariat”, but proper reporters, commentators and even intellectuals.

    But, hey, blaming Jews and Israelis is easier: it saves thinking. Knee-jerk reactions are so much easier.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: