More letters in the South African Jewish Report responding to Ran Greenstein

The debate, hosted on Engage, concerning the South African campaign to boycott Israeli academia is here.

The to and fro in the South African Jewish Report is helpfully summed up on the JFJFP website here.

And a couple of responses this week:

DAVID HIRSH asked Ran Greenstein why the University of Johannesburg singles out an Israeli university for boycott. Greenstein’s reply is that the British government has imposed sanctions against a whole lot of other countries. I don’t understand what the record of the British government has got to do with UJ’s decision to single out Israel, and only Israel, for boycott.
Richard Gold, Manchester, UK

People will have heard about the poisonous atmosphere on campus in which debates concerning Israel and Palestine take place, but last week they had the opportunity to sample it for themselves on the pages of the SA Jewish Report.  Prof Ran Greenstein, a fellow sociologist, says that for me neither words nor reality matter; he says I’m afraid of equality and democracy. He characterises my academic work on anti-Semitism as a campaign to manufacture hysteria and distortions. In other words, I don’t just get it wrong, I’m getting it wrong on purpose.  Ran referred, on a public website, to one of the Jewish Report’s journalists as “some stupid hag in a rag”.  Why do we see such a departure from the norms of rational debate which usually insist that a person is treated with respect when the truth or falsity of what they say is addressed?

It seems to me that it is no accident that this departure accompanies a campaign to single out Israeli academia for exclusion from the global academic community. Israeli universities are to be boycotted, not because of anything they do, or say, but because they are Israeli.  The boycott campaign, which exists to silence the voices of Israeli academia, prefers angry denunciation to answering the arguments of its critics.

David Hirsh, London

One Response to “More letters in the South African Jewish Report responding to Ran Greenstein”

  1. Brian Goldfarb Says:

    Interesting that JfJfP fails to publish or publicise Ran Greenstein’s “hag in a rag” comment – on the record on the Engage website, which is a prime example of sexism – and Greenstein’s supposed to be a sociologist – yet is only too happy to berate Engage for failing to continue to publish Greenstein’s comments.

    Interesting too that Greenstein continually fails to respond to criticism of his sexism as well as continual demands for evidence for his claims.

    I have to admit that I can’t be bothered to examine his letter(s) closely enough to determine whether he is actually responding to and correcting what was actually written, or is responding to what he wished he’d said (or, come to that, what he believes others have said about him).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: